In the article A
Teacher’s Use of Digital Video with Urban Middle School
Students: Expanding Definitions of Representational
Literacy by Jayne Beilke and Matthew Stuve, the
authors tell of a case study in which a teacher in an
inner city Indianapolis school used digital video to
create interest in student reading. The teacher had
students create videos of themselves playing basketball.
But in order for them to have the privilege of making
these videos they had to read a book every three weeks.
A statement that I found
interesting stated “the challenge for teachers…is to
provide students with the tools to tell their own
stories.” Students need these tools in order to create “a
narrative through representational literacy that will
close the divide between text-bound classrooms and
meta-textual worlds” (Beilke and Stuve, 2004).
Essentially teachers need to be able to teach their
students how to tell their own stories by using
representational literacy. Once students are able to
create this narrative, they will close the divide between
the traditional classroom and the classroom that utilizes
the latest innovations in technology for learning.
Another concept that I
found to be interesting was that visual literacy consists
of the ability to understand and express something in
terms of visual materials. In essence, visual literacy is
the idea that there is meaning within visual materials
that can be manipulated and presented in such a way that
a specific meaning is conveyed to others. In the case
study of the teacher in the school who used video to
create interest in reading, the students were using
visual literacy to create the videos. The students saw
meaning and information being conveyed through their
actions, the images, the surroundings, and other
elements. They used the video as a visual element to
convey a message of how important basketball was to them.
However, it is interesting
to think about how these videos may be viewed by others.
In Learning by Visualizing With Technology: Recording
Realities With Video the author discusses how
television has been used as an educational device for
students. In the early 1980s, a problem was found with
the current state of television in education. “Students
realized that they would not be responsible for
understanding any of the information contained in the
television shows.” As a result television became an
“electronic baby-sitter or substitute teacher.”
In the videos made by the
Indianapolis school students there was no direct
educational information presented. These videos were made
with the intent that it was an incentive for students to
read and hopefully create an ongoing interest in reading.
If these videos were shown to other students it is highly
likely they would perceive them as entertainment. They
would not notice the educational content. There probably
wasn’t a direct educational message presented in the
videos made by the students but it is almost certain that
there were educational elements that were inadvertently
included in the videos. However, as other students
watched these films they would view them as a form of
entertainment because they knew that they would not be
tested on the information being presented in them. Most
of the students would view these videos in the same
manner and mindset that they watch television at home, in
a passive and non-cognitive mode of thinking.
In the case study where
students made videos of basketball and some moves they
could perform, it was intended that students would become
more interested in reading and want to read in the
future. However, I doubt that the incentive of making
these videos had little effect on creating a sustainable
interest in students to continue reading. And even if
other students were to view these videos it is doubtful
that they would look at these videos as anything more
than entertainment. Children have been conditioned by
television programming to be passive recipients of
information and do not actively engage themselves in the
material being presented. With the students making the
movies they most likely met the “criteria” in order to
make these videos and after the project was complete they
probably did not change to any new reading habits. It is
almost certain that the majority of the students’
perspectives and views on reading were changed very
little if at all.